Swami Paramarthananda ji on Lessons from his Guru, Pujya Swami Dayananda ji’s Teachings
INTRODUCTION :
On the auspicious occasion of Pujya Swamiji’s satabhishekam, I would like to share some thoughts. I consider myself extremely fortunate to be a disciple of Pujya Swamiji. This is the best thing that has happened to me in my life and that can ever happen to me. For me, Swamiji is Guru, shastram, daivam. Every class, every satsangh session, every conversation- in short every action of Swamiji has been a learning opportunity for me. And that continues to be so even now. Whatever I am now, leaving aside my limitations, is because of my association with Pujya Swamiji and his teachings. It is very difficult for me to express what I got from him. However I will share some of the lessons I have learnt from Pujya Swamiji’s teachings and life. I am limiting them to a select few that are prominent in my mind and that appeal to me the most.
LESSONS FROM HIS TEACHINGS :
1. Veda is a primary means of knowledge like the sense organs. This means Veda is valid by itself.
2. Attempting to validate Veda through scientific analysis or mystic experience is a misguided approach. By this we are reducing Veda to a secondary means of knowledge like inference. Treating a primary means of knowledge like a secondary means is worse than rejecting it. Once we fall into this trap, there will be endless problems.
3. We continue to accept the validity of the eyes inspite of occasional optical illusions. Similarly we have to accept the validity of the Veda , inspite of certain seeming aberrations in certain portions of the Veda. if we reject the eyes because of occasional optical illusions, we are the losers. Similarly, if we reject the Veda because of certain seeming aberrations, we are the losers.
4. Respecting Mahatmas does not mean unconditional acceptance of all their statements. We should never surrender our intellect in the name of shraddha, bhakti, or sharanagati. Transcending the intellect in the name of spiritual pursuit will not lead us anywhere.
5. Samadhi as a state of stillness or concentration cannot lead us to any new knowledge, material or spiritual. Any knowledge, material or spiritual, has to take place in the intellect only. Any knowledge material or spiritual has to arise by the employment of a relevant means of knowledge.
6. Dakshinamurthi’s silence cannot be taken literally as a non- verbal communication, because silence is not a means of knowledge. That silence has to be understood as an indirect form of verbal communication i.e. A verbal communication through implication.
7. Self- realisation is not a mystic experience. It is nothing but Self- knowledge. And self- knowledge is nothing but a clear understanding of the fact that the ever experienced – self i.e. the ever evident I is the non- dual Brahman.
8. To grasp the message of Vedanta, we don’t require any new experience. Whatever experiences a normal human being undergoes are more than enough to grasp the message of Vedanta.
9. Desires are said to be the root cause of all evils. In fact it is the blind demonisation of all desires as a whole that is the root cause of all evils. The faculty of desire is a unique privilege enjoyed by a human being. Without the faculty of desire, one cannot even pursue self-knowledge or liberation. Abusing that faculty due to ignorance and immaturity alone is the cause of all problems.
10. Moksha is not something to be attained through a single path or multiple paths. For, moksha is not a destination. It is our very nature which has been disowned due to ignorance. Whatever is disowned due to ignorance has to be claimed through knowledge. Whenever we say that self -knowledge alone is the means of moksha, it does not mean that we are fanatics. It only means that we have diagnosed the problem correctly.
11. Self-knowledge cannot be gained through several methods. It is possible only by employing the appropriate means of knowledge i.e. by exposing oneself to the teaching of Vedanta. Any system of teaching which reveals the fact that I am the whole is Vedanta, irrespective of the language in which it conveys this fact.
12. One who knows Vedanta and knows how to handle its words properly, can communicate its message directly to a prepared student. Self- knowledge is an extra-ordinary knowledge. But it does not mean that a man of knowledge should resort to an extraordinary lifestyle.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO :
1. Show unconditional love and compassion towards all.
2. Accommodate everyone irrespective of who the other person is.
3. Help everyone known or unknown unconditionally.
4. Pay attention to every single person even when one is surrounded by a huge crowd.
5. Listen to everyone intently even when there are endless people.
6. Remain relaxed inspite of hectic activity.
7. Live a life of deliberate thoughts, deliberate words and deliberate actions, without any agenda of one’s own, taking things as they come.
8. Derive inspiration and motivation from oneself inspite of old age and poor health.
9. Lastly it is possible but not that easy to emulate Poojya Swamiji.
Find us on Facebook
Categories
Popular posts
- FAQ on Bhagavad Gita
- Three Stages of Bhakti of Bhagavad Gita and Nine Stages of Bhakti of Srimad Bhagavatam
- The context of four varnas in the Gita
- Philosophy of the Gita
- Satyam Shivam Sundaram
- Jiva and Isvara
- Raja Yoga and Jnana Yoga of Swami Vivekananda
- Meditation According to Bhagavad Gita
- Three core values from Bhagavad Gita
- Satyam Jnaanam Anantam Brahma
-
Recent posts (latest on top)
- Need of Vivekananda Study Circles in Educational Institutions
- Interpretations and Implications of Sat-Cit-Ananda
- Dvaita, Vishishthaadvaita, and Advaita
- Religious Harmony Manifesto
- Always Collaborate
- Advice to College Fresh Grads
- Guidelines for Devotees of Ramakrishna Math
- Raja Yoga and Jnana Yoga of Swami Vivekananda
- Hinduism and Harmony of Religions
- Six Aspects of Surrender
Tags
- advaita
- aim
- bhakti
- brahmacharya
- celibacy
- culture
- dharma
- evolution
- gita
- goal
- God
- happiness
- hinduism
- identity
- india
- jivanmukti
- jnana
- jnani
- karma
- liberation
- life
- meditation
- mind
- moksha
- occult
- paramarthananda
- philosophy
- pilgrimage
- purity
- purpose
- ramakrishna
- religion
- renunciation
- sadhana
- science
- self-help
- spiritual
- travel
- truth
- upanisads
- value
- values
- vedanta
- vivekananda
- yoga
Archives
Pages
- All posts
- Bhagavad Gita
- Posts related to Gita on this blog
- Course on Introduction to Bhagavad Gita
- Message of Gita
- கீதையின் செய்தி – Message of Gita (Tamil)
- గీతా సందేశము – Message of Gita (Telugu)
- ಗೀತಾದರ್ಶನ – Message of Gita (Kannada)
- Bhagavad Gita – Essence and Summary
- Bhagavad Gita – Lecture Notes
- Introduction to Bhagavad Gita – based on Sankara’s Introduction
- Bhagavad Gita Summary (Swami Tapasyananda)
- What is Practical Philosophy?
- Writings
- An Outline Of Hinduism
- Death – What to do about it?
- Indian Social Structure
- Life of Holy Mother
- Science, Religion and Philosophy
- What is Religion? – The Indian Answer
- A Brief Outline of Hinduism
- FAQ on Hinduism
- Chaar Dhaam Pilgrimage
- Drupal as a Web Application Development framework
- From Facebook
- Idea for Social Service
- Outline for a workshop or book
- e-Library
- Contribute
- About us
Hi,
Thanks for posting these. I really like the list of “It is possible to.” However, I have some difficulty with #5 and #7 of the “Lessons from his teaching.” And, I do not understand #6 at all.
Please allow me to explain my difficulty with #5 and #7. Both seem to downplay the importance of certain types of experiences that arise in meditation. How can one truly appreciate the “That thou art” equivalence unless one has a first-hand experience? Mere intellectual understanding will not suffice. Also, any amount of “neti neti” is not going to provide a clear picture as a mystical experience can. It seems to me that countless Vedantic saints have affirmed the value of these experiences. Hence, I find it surprising that Poojya Swamiji does not think much of these experiences.
Having said that, let me also clarify my point. I am not saying that these mystical experience of “oneness” is the goal. Ultimately, we live in the world of relativity and the notion of “I” cannot be completely negated while living in the body. A clear intellectual understanding, where the vedantic values are well assimilated, is essential. No amount of ecstatic, mystic experience can help us when we are in the plane of relative existence. But, Sri Ramakrishna says that the ego of the realized soul is harmless. Such a person assumes an “I” only provisionally, for the purpose of helping other jivas.
I thank you for posting this uplifting message.
Hi,
Thanks for posting these. I really like the list of “It is possible to.” However, I have some difficulty with #5 and #7 of the “Lessons from his teaching.” And, I do not understand #6 at all.
Please allow me to explain my difficulty with #5 and #7. Both seem to downplay the importance of certain types of experiences that arise in meditation. How can one truly appreciate the “That thou art” equivalence unless one has a first-hand experience? Mere intellectual understanding will not suffice. Also, any amount of “neti neti” is not going to provide a clear picture as a mystical experience can. It seems to me that countless Vedantic saints have affirmed the value of these experiences. Hence, I find it surprising that Poojya Swamiji does not think much of these experiences.
Having said that, let me also clarify my point. I am not saying that these mystical experience of “oneness” is the goal. Ultimately, we live in the world of relativity and the notion of “I” cannot be completely negated while living in the body. A clear intellectual understanding, where the vedantic values are well assimilated, is essential. No amount of ecstatic, mystic experience can help us when we are in the plane of relative existence. But, Sri Ramakrishna says that the ego of the realized soul is harmless. Such a person assumes an “I” only provisionally, for the purpose of helping other jivas.
I thank you for posting this uplifting message.
Dear Raviji,
What you have asked is a very valid question. Swami Dayanandaji and Swami Paramarthanandaji have very clearly articulated the answer to it in great details in their various talks. I would recommend that you listen to a few of their talks. “Introduction to Vedanta” is a good place to start. It is a series of 16 talks by Swami Paramarthanandaji. You can find it on YouTube and several other websites.
With regards,
Gokulmuthu.
Dear Raviji,
What you have asked is a very valid question. Swami Dayanandaji and Swami Paramarthanandaji have very clearly articulated the answer to it in great details in their various talks. I would recommend that you listen to a few of their talks. “Introduction to Vedanta” is a good place to start. It is a series of 16 talks by Swami Paramarthanandaji. You can find it on YouTube and several other websites.
With regards,
Gokulmuthu.