Inadequacy of Science

Science versus religion is a popular topic in the written and visual media in India. However, I find there are two concerns here.

One is that, they always hail science as the silver bullet for all human problems. This is one of the myths that this article tries to address.

The second is that, they are almost always written keeping in mind the concepts of the Semitic religions in mind. When religion is considered from the Indian tradition’s point of view, there is not much conflict between the two. French Nobel Laureate Romain Rolland says, “The true Vedantic spirit does not start out with a system of preconceived ideas. It possesses absolute liberty and unrivalled courage among religions with regard to the facts to be observed and the diverse hypotheses it has laid down for their coordination. Never having been hampered by a priestly order, each man has been entirely free to search wherever he pleased for the spiritual explanation of the spectacle of the universe.” When this is the case, how can there be much conflict between science and religion? If at all there is a conflict, the solution will be to go back to the “true Vedantic spirit”. Today’s Hinduism is largely based on Vedanta. Surely there is a lot of scope in aligning it further towards the “true Vedantic spirit”.  The other articles in this website deal with that in detail.

This article tries to give the reader a glimpse of the limitations of science.

Morality

According to today’s science, the fundamental entity in this universe is only material. Everything is a product of matter and energy. Thoughts are the entirely the product of chemical and electrical activity in the physical brain. The sense of individuality is an illusion created by the brain. This implies that we do not have freewill. When freewill is not there, all concepts of morality, accountability and purpose in human life collapse. In an interview with the Hindu published on February 12, 2011 (http://www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/all-in-the-brain/article1230359.ece), neurologist Dr. V. S. Ramachandran says, “The ‘moral imperative’ and that humans are genuinely free rings true to me, though that’s the minority view among scientists. I don’t know how to mix that with my Science though.” Thus, contrary to popular belief, science is fatalistic. According to science, you as a person, if at all you exist as one, have no control over what you think or do.

It is only religions, which uphold the concepts of freewill, morality, accountability and purpose. Different religions describe morality in different ways, with the fundamental common tenets being truthfulness, kindness, sense control and non-covetousness.

Fulfillment

Every living being wants happiness. Happiness can be defined as a state which the person does not mind if it continues forever. It is a state of satisfaction and fulfillment. Science can give answers to various questions. It can give technology to make life safe and comfortable. But, science cannot give fulfillment. Science cannot give happiness.

Religion is the pursuit of absolute happiness. The goal defined by different religions like Heaven, Paradise, swarga, brahmaloka, moksha, nirvana, etc. are all nothing but description of a state of absolute happiness, colored by the culture. One can question the existence of the described entity. But the intent of the pursuit is always absolute happiness. What one person considers as happiness cannot and will not be the same as what another person considers so. So the details of the goals are different for different religions. And naturally the details of the path also are different. But, behind all these differences, “absolute happiness” is the common thread.

Fundamental Questions

The mind and the senses are limited. They have access to and can judge only finite properties of objects. They have no access to and cannot judge these three questions:

  1. Is there a substance behind the properties of objects? For example, beyond all the known properties of an electron – mass, charge, spin, volume, velocity, etc. – is there anything that remains? If there is anything, what is it? What is the relationship between the substance and the properties?
  2. Is there an ultimate subject, which is “me”? The entire world, my body and my mind are all objects of my perception or conception. Independent of all these, is there an “I”, the essential subject, which is different from all objects of the sense organs and mind, and which can never become an object of perception or conception? If “I” exist, who am I? What is my nature?
  3. Is there an infinite entity? If it exists, is it self-aware? What is its relationship with the insentient world and other sentient beings?

These questions cannot be answered by science, because the sense organs and the mind do not have access to this realm. So they are non-verifiable. Any set of answers to these questions, which satisfy two criteria – (1) they should be logically consistent among themselves and (2) they should not contradict with experience – can be considered plausible. We cannot decide one over the other.

Different religions are different ways to answer these questions, in a way that the followers can lead a moral life leading to fulfillment. As psychological support, a lot of mythology, legends, rituals and customs are weaved into the religions. Thus we have different religions. As long as a religion does not declare exclusivity and promotes morality as sine qua non, the religion can be accepted as a positive force. Science can never replace religion.

Posted in religion, vedanta | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Seven Laws of Spiritual Life

Here are the seven “laws of spiritual life” as listed by Swami Yatiswaranandaji in his monumental book “Meditation and Spiritual Life”.

  1. Whatever we take to be real for the time being, affects our whole personality, thoughts, emotions and actions. Our whole being responds to this reality.
  2. Our concept of reality depends upon our concept of ourselves; that is, man’s conception of God evolves with the evolution of his consciousness.
  3. Spiritual awakening is the transformation of one’s consciousness, which means moving from a lower center to a higher center of consciousness.
  4. Though distinct from the moral imperative, spiritual aspiration must be supported by it. The practice of concentration (meditation), if not preceded and followed by purification of mind and sublimation of instincts, is likely to lead the aspirant astray.
  5. Each aspirant must first understand where he is and begin from there; but making the best use of the protection and support given to him during the early years of his life, he should outgrow them and stand on his own legs, drawing his sustenance more from the Divine than from men and institutions. This is the law of spiritual growth. It means that an aspirant can move forward in the spiritual path only if he is prepared to abandon the supports which helped him in the earlier stage.
  6. The realization of the Absolute – “the transcendental Reality” – lies always through the realization of the immanent divine Principle. The holy Personality (Ista Devata) is a manifestation of this divine Principle.
  7. The more our consciousness expands, the more we see the Divine in all people and the more spiritual we become.

We had a nice discussion on these seven points in last week’s class by Swami Muktipadanandaji in “Vivekananda Yuvak Sangha” in Ramakrishna Math, Ulsoor, Bangalore.
 

Posted in book notes, hinduism, religion, spiritual life, vedanta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Swami Vivekananda’s Call to the Youth of India

This article was published as a series in the Jan-2014, Feb-2014 and Mar-2014 issues of Vedanta Kesari, the monthly magazine of Ramakrishna Math.

(Swami Vivekananda’s ideas on India and his call to the youth of India are spread across his various talks, writings, interview and epistles. The core of his ideas was written in his letters to his disciples and brother disciples in India, and in the series of talks that he gave when he reached India. Here is a selection from his talks given at Colombo, Kumbhakonam, Madras (Chennai) and Lahore, which covers almost all the important ideas. This is intended to serve as an appetizer to help people get an overview and encourage to probe further. References and pointers for further reading are given at the end.)

Call to the Youth of India

Excerpts from the lectures of Swami Vivekananda

India’s Heartbeat

If there is any land on this earth that can lay claim to be the blessed Punya Bhumi, to be the land to which all souls on this earth must come to account for Karma, the land to which every soul that is wending its way Godward must come to attain its last home, the land where humanity has attained its highest towards gentleness, towards generosity, towards purity, towards calmness, above all, the land of introspection and of spirituality — it is India. Hence have started the founders of religions from the most ancient times, deluging the earth again and again with the pure and perennial waters of spiritual truth. Hence have proceeded the tidal waves of philosophy that have covered the earth, East or West, North or South, and hence again must start the wave which is going to spiritualise the material civilisation of the world. Here is the life-giving water with which must be quenched the burning fire of materialism which is burning the core of the hearts of millions in other lands. Believe me, my friends, this is going to be. (Colombo)

In other countries religion is only one of the many necessities in life. …  Politics, social improvement, in one word, this world, is the goal of mankind in the West, and God and religion come in quietly as helpers to attain that goal. Their God is, so to speak, the Being who helps to cleanse and to furnish this world for them; that is apparently all the value of God for them. All the arguments they produce against the Indian religion is this — that our religion does not conduce to well-being in this world, that it does not bring gold to us, that it does not make us robbers of nations, that it does not make the strong stand upon the bodies of the weak and feed themselves with the life-blood of the weak. Certainly our religion does not do that. It cannot send cohorts, under whose feet the earth trembles, for the purpose of destruction and pillage and the ruination of races. Therefore they say — what is there in this religion? It does not bring any grist to the grinding mill, any strength to the muscles; what is there in such a religion? (Kumbhakonam)

They little dream that that is the very argument with which we prove our religion, because it does not make for this world. Ours is the only true religion because, according to it, this little sense-world of three days’ duration is not to be made the end and aim of all, is not to be our great goal. This little earthly horizon of a few feet is not that which bounds the view of our religion. Ours is away beyond, and still beyond; beyond the senses, beyond space, and beyond time, away, away beyond, till nothing of this world is left and the universe itself becomes like a drop in the transcendent ocean of the glory of the soul. Ours is the true religion because it teaches that God alone is true, that this world is false and fleeting, that all your gold is but as dust, that all your power is finite, and that life itself is oftentimes an evil; therefore it is, that ours is the true religion. Ours is the true religion because, above all, it teaches renunciation and stands up with the wisdom of ages to tell and to declare to the nations who are mere children of yesterday in comparison with us Hindus — who own the hoary antiquity of the wisdom, discovered by our ancestors here in India — to tell them in plain words: “Children, you are slaves of the senses; there is only finiteness in the senses, there is only ruination in the senses; the three short days of luxury here bring only ruin at last. Give it all up, renounce the love of the senses and of the world; that is the way of religion.” Through renunciation is the way to the goal and not through enjoyment. Therefore ours is the only true religion. (Kumbhakonam)

We have, as it were, thrown a challenge to the whole world from the most ancient times. In the West, they are trying to solve the problem how much a man can possess, and we are trying here to solve the problem on how little a man can live. This struggle and this difference will still go on for some centuries. But if history has any truth in it and if prognostications ever prove true, it must be that those who train themselves to live on the least and control themselves well will in the end gain the battle, and that those who run after enjoyment and luxury, however vigorous they may seem for the moment, will have to die and become annihilated. There are times in the history of a man’s life, nay, in the history of the lives of nations, when a sort of world-weariness becomes painfully predominant. It seems that such a tide of world-weariness has come upon the Western world. There, too, they have their thinkers, great men; and they are already finding out that this race after gold and power is all vanity of vanities; many, nay, most of the cultured men and women there, are already weary of this competition, this struggle, this brutality of their commercial civilisation, and they are looking forward towards something better. … These races of the West are eager for some new thought, for some new philosophy; the religion they have had, Christianity, although good and glorious in many respects, has been imperfectly understood, and is, as understood hitherto, found to be insufficient. The thoughtful men of the West find in our ancient philosophy, especially in the Vedanta, the new impulse of thought they are seeking, the very spiritual food and drink for which they are hungering and thirsting. And it is no wonder that this is so. (Kumbhakonam)

India’s Mission

Each race has a peculiar mission to fulfil in the life of the world. Each race has to make its own result, to fulfil its own mission. Political greatness or military power is never the mission of our race; it never was, and, mark my words, it never will be. But there has been the other mission given to us, which is to conserve, to preserve, to accumulate, as it were, into a dynamo, all the spiritual energy of the race, and that concentrated energy is to pour forth in a deluge on the world whenever circumstances are propitious. (Colombo)

But there is another peculiarity. … We never preached our thoughts with fire and sword. Slow and silent, as the gentle dew that falls in the morning, unseen and unheard yet producing a most tremendous result, has been the work of the calm, patient, all-suffering spiritual race upon the world of thought. (Colombo)

Today, under the blasting light of modern science, when old and apparently strong and invulnerable beliefs have been shattered to their very foundations, … when religion in the West is only in the hands of the ignorant and the knowing ones look down with scorn upon anything belonging to religion, here comes to the fore the philosophy of India, which displays the highest religious aspirations of the Indian mind, where the grandest philosophical facts have been the practical spirituality of the people. This naturally is coming to the rescue, the idea of the oneness of all, the Infinite, the idea of the Impersonal, the wonderful idea of the eternal soul of man, of the unbroken continuity in the march of beings, and the infinity of the universe. The old sects looked upon the world as a little mud-puddle and thought that time began but the other day. It was there in our old books, and only there that the grand idea of the infinite range of time, space, and causation, and above all, the infinite glory of the spirit of man governed all the search for religion. When the modern tremendous theories of evolution and conservation of energy and so forth are dealing death blows to all sorts of crude theologies, what can hold any more the allegiance of cultured humanity but the most wonderful, convincing, broadening, and ennobling ideas that can be found only in that most marvellous product of the soul of man, the wonderful voice of God, the Vedanta? (Colombo)

At the same time, I must remark that what I mean by our religion working upon the nations outside of India comprises only the principles, the background, the foundation upon which that religion is built. The detailed workings, the minute points which have been worked out through centuries of social necessity, little ratiocinations about manners and customs and social well-being, do not rightly find a place in the category of religion. We know that in our books a clear distinction is made between two sets of truths. The one set is that which abides for ever, being built upon the nature of man, the nature of the soul, the soul’s relation to God, the nature of God, perfection, and so on; there are also the principles of cosmology, of the infinitude of creation, or more correctly speaking — projection, the wonderful law of cyclical procession, and so on — these are the eternal principles founded upon the universal laws in nature. The other set comprises the minor laws which guided the working of our everyday life.  (Colombo)

The great principles underlying all this wonderful, infinite, ennobling, expansive view of man and God and the world have been produced in India. In India alone man has not stood up to fight for a little tribal God, saying “My God is true and yours is not true; let us have a good fight over it.” It was only here that such ideas did not occur as fighting for little gods. These great underlying principles, being based upon the eternal nature of man, are as potent today for working for the good of the human race as they were thousands of years ago, and they will remain so. (Colombo)

Principles of Hinduism

There are certain great principles in which, I think, we — whether Vaishnavas, Shaivas, Shâktas, or Gânapatyas, whether belonging to the ancient Vedantists or the modern ones, whether belonging to the old rigid sects or the modern reformed ones — are all one, and whoever calls himself a Hindu, believes in these principles. Of course there is a difference in the interpretation, in the explanation of these principles, and that difference should be there, and it should be allowed, for our standard is not to bind every man down to our position. It would be a sin to force every man to work out our own interpretation of things, and to live by our own methods. (Lahore)

1. Vedas

Perhaps all who are here will agree on the first point that we believe the Vedas to be the eternal teachings of the secrets of religion. We all believe that this holy literature is without beginning and without end, coeval with nature, which is without beginning and without end; and that all our religious differences, all our religious struggles must end when we stand in the presence of that holy book; we are all agreed that this is the last court of appeal in all our spiritual differences. We may take different points of view as to what the Vedas are. There may be one sect which regards one portion as more sacred than another, but that matters little so long as we say that we are all brothers in the Vedas, that out of these venerable, eternal, marvellous books has come everything that we possess today, good, holy, and pure. Well, therefore, if we believe in all this, let this principle first of all be preached broadcast throughout the length and breadth of the land. If this be true, let the Vedas have that prominence which they always deserve, and which we all believe in. (Lahore)

2. God

The second point we all believe in is God, the creating, the preserving power of the whole universe, and unto whom it periodically returns to come out at other periods and manifest this wonderful phenomenon, called the universe. We may differ as to our conception of God. One may believe in a God who is entirely personal, another may believe in a God who is personal and yet not human, and yet another may believe in a God who is entirely impersonal, and all may get their support from the Vedas. Still we are all believers in God; that is to say, that man who does not believe in a most marvellous Infinite Power from which everything has come, in which everything lives, and to which everything must in the end return, cannot be called a Hindu. If that be so, let us try to preach that idea all over the land. Preach whatever conception you have to give, there is no difference, we are not going to fight over it, but preach God; that is all we want. One idea may be better than another, but, mind you, not one of them is bad. One is good, another is better, and again another may be the best, but the word bad does not enter the category of our religion. Therefore, may the Lord bless them all who preach the name of God in what ever form they like! The more He is preached, the better for this race. Let our children be brought up in this idea, let this idea enter the homes of the poorest and the lowest, as well as of the richest and the highest — the idea of the name of God. (Lahore)

3. World

The third idea that I will present before you is that, unlike all other races of the world, we do not believe that this world was created only so many thousand years ago, and is going to be destroyed eternally on a certain day. Nor do we believe that the human soul has been created along with this universe just out of nothing. Here is another point I think we are all able to agree upon. We believe in nature being without beginning and without end; only at psychological periods this gross material of the outer universe goes back to its finer state, thus to remain for a certain period, again to be projected outside to manifest all this infinite panorama we call nature. This wavelike motion was going on even before time began, through eternity, and will remain for an infinite period of time. (Lahore)

4. Man

Next, all Hindus believe that man is not only a gross material body; not only that within this there is the finer body, the mind, but there is something yet greater — for the body changes and so does the mind — something beyond, the Âtman — I cannot translate the word to you for any translation will be wrong — that there is something beyond even this fine body, which is the Atman of man, which has neither beginning nor end, which knows not what death is. And then this peculiar idea, different from that of all other races of men, that this Atman inhabits body after body until there is no more interest for it to continue to do so, and it becomes free, not to be born again, I refer to the theory of Samsâra and the theory of eternal souls taught by our Shâstras. This is another point where we all agree, whatever sect we may belong to. There may be differences as to the relation between the soul and God. According to one sect the soul may be eternally different from God, according to another it may be a spark of that infinite fire, yet again according to others it may be one with that Infinite. It does not matter what our interpretation is, so long as we hold on to the one basic belief that the soul is infinite, that this soul was never created, and therefore will never die, that it had to pass and evolve into various bodies, till it attained perfection in the human one — in that we are all agreed. (Lahore)

5. Eternal Purity of Atman

And then comes the most differentiating, the grandest, and the most wonderful discovery in the realms of spirituality that has ever been made. Some of you, perhaps, who have been studying Western thought, may have observed already that there is another radical difference severing at one stroke all that is Western from all that is Eastern. It is this that we hold, whether we are Shâktas, Sauras, or Vaishnavas, even whether we are Bauddhas or Jainas, we all hold in India that the soul is by its nature pure and perfect, infinite in power and blessed. Only, according to the dualist, this natural blissfulness of the soul has become contracted by past bad work, and through the grace of God it is again going to open out and show its perfection; while according to the monist, even this idea of contraction is a partial mistake, it is the veil of Maya that causes us to think the, soul has lost its powers, but the powers are there fully manifest. (Lahore)

This is one great point to understand, and, my friends, my brethren, let me tell you, this is the one point we shall have to insist upon in the future. For I am firmly convinced, and I beg you to understand this one fact – no good comes out of the man who day and night thinks he is nobody. … We are the children of the Almighty, we are sparks of the infinite, divine fire. How can we be nothings? We are everything, ready to do everything, we can do everything, and man must do everything. This faith in themselves was in the hearts of our ancestors, this faith in themselves was the motive power that pushed them forward and forward in the march of civilisation; and if there has been degeneration, if there has been defect, mark my words, you will find that degradation to have started on the day our people lost this faith in themselves. Losing faith in one’s self means losing faith in God. Do you believe in that infinite, good Providence working in and through you? If you believe that this Omnipresent One, the Antaryâmin, is present in every atom, is through and through, Ota-prota, as the Sanskrit word goes, penetrating your body, mind and soul, how can you lose, heart? I may be a little bubble of water, and you may be a mountain-high wave. Never mind! The infinite ocean is the background of me as well as of you. Mine also is that infinite ocean of life, of power, of spirituality, as well as yours. I am already joined — from my very birth, from the very fact of my life — I am in Yoga with that infinite life and infinite goodness and infinite power, as you are, mountain-high though you may be. Therefore, my brethren, teach this life-saving, great, ennobling, grand doctrine to your children, even from their very birth. (Lahore)

India’s Lessons on Religion

1. Principles vs Personality

Excepting our own almost all the other great religions in the world are inevitably connected with the life or lives of one or more of their founders. All their theories, their teachings, their doctrines, and their ethics are built round the life of a personal founder, from whom they get their sanction, their authority, and their power; and strangely enough, upon the historicity of the founder’s life is built, as it were, all the fabric of such religions. If there is one blow dealt to the historicity of that life, as has been the case in modern times with the lives of almost all the so-called founders of religion — we know that half of the details of such lives is not now seriously believed in, and that the other half is seriously doubted — if this becomes the case, if that rock of historicity, as they pretend to call it, is shaken and shattered, the whole building tumbles down, broken absolutely, never to regain its lost status. (Kumbhakonam)

Every one of the great religions in the world excepting our own, is built upon such historical characters; but ours rests upon principles. There is no man or woman who can claim to have created the Vedas. They are the embodiment of eternal principles; sages discovered them; and now and then the names of these sages are mentioned — just their names; we do not even know who or what they were. In many cases we do not know who their fathers were, and almost in every case we do not know when and where they were born. But what cared they, these sages, for their names? They were the preachers of principles, and they themselves, so far as they went, tried to become illustrations of the principles they preached. (Kumbhakonam)

At the same time, just as our God is an Impersonal and yet a Personal God, so is our religion a most intensely impersonal one — a religion based upon principles — and yet with an infinite scope for the play of persons; for what religion gives you more Incarnations, more prophets and seers, and still waits for infinitely more? The Bhâgavata says that Incarnations are infinite, leaving ample scope for as many as you like to come. Therefore if any one or more of these persons in India’s religious history, any one or more of these Incarnations, and any one or more of our prophets proved not to have been historical, it does not injure our religion at all; even then it remains firm as ever, because it is based upon principles, and not upon persons. It is in vain we try to gather all the peoples of the world around a single personality. It is difficult to make them gather together even round eternal and universal principles. If it ever becomes possible to bring the largest portion of humanity to one way of thinking in regard to religion, mark you, it must be always through principles and not through persons. Yet as I have said, our religion has ample scope for the authority and influence of persons. There is that most wonderful theory of Ishta which gives you the fullest and the freest choice possible among these great religious personalities. You may take up any one of the prophets or teachers as your guide and the object of your special adoration; you are even allowed to think that he whom you have chosen is the greatest of the prophets, greatest of all the Avatâras; there is no harm in that, but you must keep to a firm background of eternally true principles. The strange fact here is that the power of our Incarnations has been holding good with us only so far as they are illustrations of the principles in the Vedas. The glory of Shri Krishna is that he has been the best preacher of our eternal religion of principles and the best commentator on the Vedanta that ever lived in India. (Kumbhakonam)

2. Rationality of Religion

The second claim of the Vedanta upon the attention of the world is that, of all the scriptures in the world, it is the one scripture the teaching of which is in entire harmony with the results that have been attained by the modern scientific investigations of external nature. … It seems clear that the conclusions of modern materialistic science can be acceptable, harmoniously with their religion, only to the Vedantins or Hindus as they are called. It seems clear that modern materialism can hold its own and at the same time approach spirituality by taking up the conclusions of the Vedanta. It seems to us, and to all who care to know, that the conclusions of modern science are the very conclusions the Vedanta reached ages ago; only, in modern science they are written in the language of matter. This then is another claim of the Vedanta upon modern Western minds, its rationality, the wonderful rationalism of the Vedanta. (Kumbhakonam)

3. Acceptance of Religious Diversity

India alone was to be, of all lands, the land of toleration and of spirituality; and therefore the fight between tribes and their gods did not long take place here. For one of the greatest sages that was ever born found out here in India even at that distant time, which history cannot reach, and into whose gloom even tradition itself dares not peep — in that distant time the sage arose and declared, ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti — “He who exists is one; the sages call Him variously.” This is one of the most memorable sentences that was ever uttered, one of the grandest truths that was ever discovered. And for us Hindus this truth has been the very backbone of our national existence. For throughout the vistas of the centuries of our national life, this one idea — ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti — comes down, gaining in volume and in fullness till it has permeated the whole of our national existence, till it has mingled in our blood, and has become one with us. We live that grand truth in every vein, and our country has become the glorious land of religious toleration. (Kumbhakonam)

The world is waiting for this grand idea of universal toleration. It will be a great acquisition to civilisation. Nay, no civilisation can long exist unless this idea enters into it. No civilisation can grow unless fanatics, bloodshed, and brutality stop. No civilisation can begin to lift up its head until we look charitably upon one another; and the first step towards that much-needed charity is to look charitably and kindly upon the religious convictions of others. Nay more, to understand that not only should we be charitable, but positively helpful to each other, however different our religious ideas and convictions may be. And that is exactly what we do in India as I have just related to you. (Kumbhakonam)

4. Spiritual Oneness, the Rationale of all Ethics

The other great idea that the world wants from us today, … is that eternal grand idea of the spiritual oneness of the whole universe. I need not tell you today, … how the modern researches of the West have demonstrated through physical means the oneness and the solidarity of the whole universe; how, physically speaking, you and I, the sun, moon, and stars are but little waves or wavelets in the midst of an infinite ocean of matter; how Indian psychology demonstrated ages ago that, similarly, both body and mind are but mere names or little wavelets in the ocean of matter, the Samashti; and how, going one step further, it is also shown in the Vedanta that behind that idea of the unity of the whole show, the real Soul is one. There is but one Soul throughout the universe, all is but One Existence. … It is the one great life-giving idea which the world wants from us today, and which the mute masses of India want for their uplifting, for none can regenerate this land of ours without the practical application and effective operation of this ideal of the oneness of things. (Kumbhakonam)

The rational West is earnestly bent upon seeking out the rationality, the raison d’ être of all its philosophy and its ethics; and you all know well that ethics cannot be derived from the mere sanction of any personage, however great and divine he may have been. Such an explanation of the authority of ethics appeals no more to the highest of the world’s thinkers; they want something more than human sanction for ethical and moral codes to be binding, they want some eternal principle of truth as the sanction of ethics. And where is that eternal sanction to be found except in the only Infinite Reality that exists in you and in me and in all, in the Self, in the Soul? The infinite oneness of the Soul is the eternal sanction of all morality, that you and I are not only brothers — every literature voicing man’s struggle towards freedom has preached that for you — but that you and I are really one. This is the dictate of Indian philosophy. This oneness is the rationale of all ethics and all spirituality. (Kumbhakonam)

Let every man and woman and child, without respect of caste or birth, weakness or strength, hear and learn that behind the strong and the weak, behind the high and the low, behind every one, there is that Infinite Soul, assuring the infinite possibility and the infinite capacity of all to become great and good. Let us proclaim to every soul: uttishthata jagrata prapya varannibodhata — Arise, awake, and stop not till the goal is reached. Arise, awake! Awake from this hypnotism of weakness. None is really weak; the soul is infinite, omnipotent, and omniscient. Stand up, assert yourself, proclaim the God within you, do not deny Him! Too much of inactivity, too much of weakness, too much of hypnotism has been and is upon our race. O ye modern Hindus, de-hypnotise yourselves. The way to do that is found in your own sacred books. Teach yourselves, teach every one his real nature, call upon the sleeping soul and see how it awakes. Power will come, glory will come, goodness will come, purity will come, and everything that is excellent will come when this sleeping soul is roused to self-conscious activity. Ay, if there is anything in the Gita that I like, it is these two verses, coming out strong as the very gist, the very essence, of Krishna’s teaching — “He who sees the Supreme Lord dwelling alike in all beings, the Imperishable in things that perish, he sees indeed. For seeing the Lord as the same, everywhere present, he does not destroy the Self by the Self, and thus he goes to the highest goal.” (Kumbhakonam)

Our National Ideal

In all our books stands out prominently this ideal of the Brahmin. … Our ideal is the Brahmin of spiritual culture and renunciation. By the Brahmin ideal what do I mean? I mean the ideal Brahmin-ness in which worldliness is altogether absent and true wisdom is abundantly present. That is the ideal of the Hindu race. Have you not heard how it is declared that he, the Brahmin, is not amenable to law, that he has no law, that he is not governed by kings, and that his body cannot be hurt? That is perfectly true. Do not understand it in the light thrown upon it by interested and ignorant fools, but understand it in the light of the true and original Vedantic conception. If the Brahmin is he who has killed all selfishness and who lives and works to acquire and propagate wisdom and the power of love — if a country is altogether inhabited by such Brahmins, by men and women who are spiritual and moral and good, is it strange to think of that country as being above and beyond all law? What police, what military are necessary to govern them? Why should any one govern them at all? Why should they live under a government? They are good and noble, and they are the men of God; these are our ideal Brahmins. … The command is the same to you all, that you must make progress without stopping, and that from the highest man to the lowest Pariah, every one in this country has to try and become the ideal Brahmin. This Vedantic idea is applicable not only here but over the whole world. Such is our ideal of caste as meant for raising all humanity slowly and gently towards the realisation of that great ideal of the spiritual man who is non-resisting, calm, steady, worshipful, pure, and meditative. (Kumbhakonam)

Rejuvenation of India

1. Spiritual Knowledge and Sanskrit Language for all

My idea is first of all to bring out the gems of spirituality that are stored up in our books and in the possession of a few only, hidden, as it were, in monasteries and in forests — to bring them out; to bring the knowledge out of them, not only from the hands where it is hidden, but from the still more inaccessible chest, the language in which it is preserved, the incrustation of centuries of Sanskrit words. In one word, I want to make them popular. I want to bring out these ideas and let them be the common property of all, of every man in India, whether he knows the Sanskrit language or not. (Madras)

The ideas must be taught in the language of the people; at the same time, Sanskrit education must go on along with it, because the very sound of Sanskrit words gives a prestige and a power and a strength to the race. … It is culture that withstands shocks, not a simple mass of knowledge. You can put a mass of knowledge into the world, but that will not do it much good. There must come culture into the blood. We all know in modern times of nations which have masses of knowledge, but what of them? They are like tigers, they are like savages, because culture is not there. Knowledge is only skin-deep, as civilisation is, and a little scratch brings out the old savage. Such things happen; this is the danger. Teach the masses in the vernaculars, give them ideas; they will get information, but something more is necessary; give them culture. Until you give them that, there can be no permanence in the raised condition of the masses. There will be another caste created, having the advantage of the Sanskrit language, which will quickly get above the rest and rule them all the same. The only safety, I tell you men who belong to the lower castes, the only way to raise your condition is to study Sanskrit, and this fighting and writing and frothing against the higher castes is in vain, it does no good, and it creates fight and quarrel, and this race, unfortunately already divided, is going to be divided more and more. The only way to bring about the levelling of caste is to appropriate the culture, the education which is the strength of the higher castes. That done, you have what you want. (Madras)

2. Unity of Castes

The solution of the caste problem in India, therefore, assumes this form, not to degrade the higher castes, not to crush out the Brahmin. … The solution is not by bringing down the higher, but by raising the lower up to the level of the higher. And that is the line of work that is found in all our books. (Madras)

It is the duty of the Brahmin, therefore, to work for the salvation of the rest of mankind in India. If he does that, and so long as he does that, he is a Brahmin, but he is no Brahmin when he goes about making money. … Secular employment is not for the Brahmin but for the other castes. To the Brahmins I appeal, that they must work hard to raise the Indian people by teaching them what they know, by giving out the culture that they have accumulated for centuries. It is clearly the duty of the Brahmins of India to remember what real Brahminhood is. As Manu says, all these privileges and honours are given to the Brahmin, because “with him is the treasury of virtue”. He must open that treasury and distribute its valuables to the world. (Madras)

To the non-Brahmin castes I say, wait, be not in a hurry. Do not seize every opportunity of fighting the Brahmin, because, as I have shown, you are suffering from your own fault. Who told you to neglect spirituality and Sanskrit learning? What have you been doing all this time? Why have you been indifferent? Why do you now fret and fume because somebody else had more brains, more energy, more pluck and go, than you? Instead of wasting your energies in vain discussions and quarrels in the newspapers, instead of fighting and quarrelling in your own homes — which is sinful — use all your energies in acquiring the culture which the Brahmin has, and the thing is done. Why do you not become Sanskrit scholars? Why do you not spend millions to bring Sanskrit education to all the castes of India? That is the question. The moment you do these things, you are equal to the Brahmin. That is the secret of power in India. Sanskrit and prestige go together in India. As soon as you have that, none dares say anything against you. That is the one secret; take that up. (Madras)

Being of one mind is the secret of society. And the more you go on fighting and quarrelling about all trivialities such as “Dravidian” and “Aryan”, and the question of Brahmins and non-Brahmins and all that, the further you are off from that accumulation of energy and power which is going to make the future India. For mark you, the future India depends entirely upon that. That is the secret — accumulation of will-power, co-ordination, bringing them all, as it here, into one focus. (Madras)

3. Service to the Country

For the next fifty years this alone shall be our keynote — this, our great Mother India. Let all other vain gods disappear for the time from our minds. This is the only god that is awake, our own race — “everywhere his hands, everywhere his feet, everywhere his ears, he covers everything.” All other gods are sleeping. What vain gods shall we go after and yet cannot worship the god that we see all round us, the Virât? When we have worshipped this, we shall be able to worship all other gods. Before we can crawl half a mile, we want to cross the ocean like Hanumân! It cannot be. Everyone going to be a Yogi, everyone going to meditate! It cannot be. The whole day mixing with the world with Karma Kânda, and in the evening sitting down and blowing through your nose! Is it so easy? Should Rishis come flying through the air, because you have blown three times through the nose? Is it a joke? It is all nonsense. What is needed is Chittashuddhi, purification of the heart. And how does that come? The first of all worship is the worship of the Virat — of those all around us. Worship It. Worship is the exact equivalent of the Sanskrit word, and no other English word will do. These are all our gods — men and animals; and the first gods we have to worship are our countrymen. These we have to worship, instead of being jealous of each other and fighting each other. It is the most terrible Karma for which we are suffering, and yet it does not open our eyes! (Madras)

4. Right Education

We must have a hold on the spiritual and secular education of the nation. Do you understand that? You must dream it, you must talk it, you must think its and you must work it out. Till then there is no salvation for the race. … Education is not the amount of information that is put into your brain and runs riot there, undigested, all your life. We must have life-building, man-making, character-making assimilation of ideas. If you have assimilated five ideas and made them your life and character, you have more education than any man who has got by heart a whole library yata kharashcandana bharavahi bharasya vetta na tu candanasya — “The ass carrying its load of sandalwood knows only the weight and not the value of the sandalwood.” If education is identical with information, the libraries are the greatest sages in the world, and encyclopaedias are the Rishis. The ideal, therefore, is that we must have the whole education of our country, spiritual and secular, in our own hands, and it must be on national lines, through national methods as far as practical. (Madras)

5. An Institution

We must have a temple, for with Hindus religion must come first. Then, you may say, all sects will quarrel about it. But we will make it a non-sectarian temple, having only “Om” as the symbol, the greatest symbol of any sect. If there is any sect here which believes that “Om” ought not to be the symbol, it has no right to call itself Hindu. All will have the right to interpret Hinduism, each one according to his own sect ideas, but we must have a common temple. You can have your own images and symbols in other places, but do not quarrel here with those who differ from you. Here should be taught the common grounds of our different sects, and at the same time the different sects should have perfect liberty to come and teach their doctrines, with only one restriction, that is, not to quarrel with other sects. (Madras)

Secondly, in connection with this temple there should be an institution to train teachers who must go about preaching religion and giving secular education to our people; they must carry both. As we have been already carrying religion from door to door, let us along with it carry secular education also. That can be easily done. Then the work will extend through these bands of teachers and preachers, and gradually we shall have similar temples in other places, until we have covered the whole of India. (Madras)

Call to the Youth

Where are the men? That is the question. … Will you respond to the call of your nation? Each one of you has a glorious future if you dare believe me. Have a tremendous faith in yourselves, like the faith I had when I was a child, and which I am working out now. Have that faith, each one of you, in yourself — that eternal power is lodged in every soul — and you will revive the whole of India. Ay, we will then go to every country under the sun, and our ideas will before long be a component of the many forces that are working to make up every nation in the world. We must enter into the life of every race in India and abroad; shall have to work to bring this about. Now for that, I want young men. “It is the young, the strong, and healthy, of sharp intellect that will reach the Lord”, say the Vedas. This is the time to decide your future — while you possess the energy of youth, not when you are worn out and jaded, but in the freshness and vigour of youth. Work — this is the time; for the freshest, the untouched, and unsmelled flowers alone are to be laid at the feet of the Lord, and such He receives. Rouse yourselves, therefore, or life is short. There are greater works to be done than aspiring to become lawyers and picking quarrels and such things. A far greater work is this sacrifice of yourselves for the benefit of your race, for the welfare of humanity. What is in this life? … Life is short, but the soul is immortal and eternal, and one thing being certain, death, let us therefore take up a great ideal and give up our whole life to it. Let this be our determination, and may He, the Lord, who “comes again and again for the salvation of His own people”, to quote from our scriptures — may the great Krishna bless us and lead us all to the fulfilment of our aims! (Madras)

Reference:

  • Colombo – First public lecture in the East, given at Colombo
  • Kumbhakonam – The Mission of Vedanta, given at Kumbhakonam
  • Madras – The Future of India, given at Madras (Chennai)
  • Lahore – The Common Bases of Hinduism, given at Lahore

For further reading:

  • Lectures from Colombo to Almora
  • Talks with Swami Vivekananda
  • Letters of Swami Vivekananda
  • Life of Swami Vivekananda by his Eastern and Western Disciples
  • Reminiscences of Swami Vivekananda
Posted in hinduism, religion | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Three Stages of Bhakti

God (Ishvara) is that being to whom the entire material universe is the body, the cosmic dynamics is the activity, all the thoughts of all the individual beings put together is the mind and the self-awareness of the whole universe is the self. Devotion (bhakti) is the relationship of an individual being (jiva) with God.

Bhagavad Gita presents three stages of Bhakti:

  1. Eka rupa ishvara bhakti – God as a particular personality
  2. Vishva rupa ishvara bhakti – God as the cosmic personality
  3. Arupa ishvara bhakti – God as beyond all personality

These three are beautifully described in three consecutive verses – 9.26, 27, 28 – respectively.

There are three basic entities in Vedanta:

  1. jiva – Jiva is the sentient individual.
  2. jagat – Jagat is the insentient world.
  3. ishvara – Ishvara is God, the origin, support and substance of everything.

In each stage of Bhakti, the relationship between these three entities are different, as can be seen below.

Eka rupa ishvara bhakti

In this stage, ishvara, jagat and jiva are considered to be different from each other. Ishvara is the creator and controller of the jagat and jivas. The jivas do action in the jagat. Ishvara dispenses the fruits of the action to the jivas, which create further situations in their life. Ishvara creates, maintains and recycles the jagat for the benefit of the jivas.

The jivas should do good action and they will get pleasant results. They offer the fruits of their actions to ishvara out of gratitude. This offering is symbolic, because it is ishvara who has given the results. It is the attitude that is important.

patram pushpam phalam toyam yo me bhaktyaa prayaschati
tat aham bhaktyupahrtam ashnaami prayataatmanaha

Whoever offers a leaf, flower, fruit or water with devotion, I accept that pure-hearted offering of devotion. (Gita – 9.26)

It should be noted that the offering of leaf, flower, etc is only symbolic. It is a psychological tool to express the emotions. It is like a child giving a greeting card, bought out of his pocket money,  to his father on his birthday. Whatever is offered is already God’s only. The object offered helps the devotee to express his emotions and also helps him to deepen his emotions. The emotion of love (devotion) and gratitude is more important than the offering itself. This symbolic offering helps him to remember that it is God who has given the fruits of his actions.

The devotee may worship God through a form or as formless. As long as the devotee sees God different from the world, he belongs to this stage.

Vishva rupa ishvara bhakti

In this stage, the jagat is considered not different from ishvara. God is the material cause of the world also. God has created this world out of Himself only. In other words, it is God who has become this world.

Every action that a jiva does is to ishvara only. There are only two entities. The jiva and the ishvara. From a jiva’s point of view, all the other jivas also form a part of ishvara only. So the entire life is a play with God.

yat karoshi yat ashnaasi yat juhoshi dadaasi yat
yat tapasyasi kaunteya tat kurushva mad arpanam

Whatever you contribute, whatever you consume, and also, whatever you do (as constructive activity), whatever you give (as charity) and whatever austerities that you perform, do them all as offerings to Me. (Gita – 9.27)

This attitude is called vishva rupa darshana. Here, there is no division between sacred and secular. Every action is sacred. The action itself is the offering to God. Every action is a naivedyam (gift to God). Every situation is a prasaadam (gift from God). This attitude will result in a high level of honesty, compassion, enthusiasm and tenacity in everyday life.

Arupa ishvara bhakti

In this stage, the jiva also merges with the ishvara. There is no multiplicity. The jiva, knowing its essential nature as pure Consciousness (caitanya), which is without any attributes (nirguna), changeless (nirvikaara), eternal (nitya), actionless (akarta), unaffected (abhokta), partless (akhanda) and one (ekam eva adviteeyam). Thus as pure Consciousness, the jiva has no limited individuality. It is non-different from ishvara.

Thus having surrendered all individuality, the jiva is free from action and its results, even while continuing the life in the world.

shubha ashubha phalair evam mokshyase karma bandhanaihi
sannyaasa yoga uktaatmaa vimukto maam upaishyasi

With mind devoted to renunciation of all individuality through the knowledge of the Self, the jiva becoming from free the pleasant and unpleasant results and from the bondage of action, attains essential oneness with ishvara, and thus becomes liberated. (Gita 9-28)

Thus, the last stage of Bhakti is the same as jnaana. Gita describes another type of gradation of devotees as – one who seeks God for relief from suffering (aarti), one who seeks God for material benefits (arthaarthi), one who seeks God to have pure love for God (jignaasu) and one who has realized his oneness with God (jnaani). Of these, Gita clearly says that the jnaani is the highest class of devotees. The jnaani bhakta alone is the liberated.

These have been beautifully presented by Swami Paramarthanandaji in his various lectures on the Gita.

Posted in advaita, hinduism, religion, spiritual life, vedanta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Indian Philosophy’s Way to Religious Plurality

We live in a time when people of different religions have to be in touch with each other, live together and work together. In such a context, acceptance of plurality of religions is mandatory for peaceful coexistence and smooth relationships. There needs to be a strong theoretical foundation to accept religious plurality.

The ancient yet lively Hindu Dharma system, which can be approximately called “Indian Philosophy”, offers a wonderful system towards this.

Purpose of Religion

Every person, in fact every living being,  wants to be happy and does not want to face sorrow. Most of the people seek happiness through the enjoyment of the presence of people, objects and situations. Whether it is possible and to what extent, is a different discussion. However, given the fact that most people pursue happiness this way, unfortunately, one person’s pursuit of happiness is limited by another person’s pursuit. Thus, it is necessary to regulate the pursuit. Being “good” is to ensure that one person’s pursuit of happiness does not interfere with the pursuit of happiness by another person. Thus, there is a necessity for people to be good. Thus, to be happy and to be good are necessary for human beings.

In Indian Philosophy, the pursuit of ultimate absolute happiness is called “moksha”. Pursuit relative happiness in the world of people and objects is called “artha” and “kama”. Being good is called “dharma”. (A detailed discussion on this can be found here.)

Now, the question is, “How can we inspire a person to be good?” Not everyone can understand, appreciate and be inspired by the necessity to be good, so that he does not limit someone’s pursuit of happiness. So, for the common man, there needs to be an “artificial” reason to be good. Just as how the law shows sticks and carrots to make people follow some order in life – like for example, not to drink and drive, which is actually for the good of the person – there needs to be some sticks and carrots to make people to be good. This is the purpose of all religions.

According to Advaita Vedanta, one of the very popular systems of Indian Philosophy, absolute happiness has to be unconditional. If there is a possibility of unconditional happiness, it should be available here and now. So, the only reason that a person may not be happy is because of not having the knowledge that happiness is here and now, or not availing it. (You can find a detailed discussion on this here.) The mind has to be prepared to understand, assimilate and avail this ever-present unconditional happiness. This system shows by rigorous logic that this preparation can be achieved only by being good. Thus, “being good” is shown as a necessary means to “be happy”.

Different religions and philosophies link “being good” to “being happy” in different ways.

Features of Religion

The mind and the sense organs can access only finite properties of objects. They cannot evaluate the infinite. They cannot evaluate the substance behind the properties. They cannot evaluate the subject who perceives or conceives the object. Whether they exist, if they exist, are they the same or different, etc. cannot be evaluated by the mind and the sense organs. So they are entirely left to the belief of individuals. This is where various religions, theologies and philosophies come into picture. So, the three questions are – “Who is God (the infinite)?”, “What is this world (the substance)?”, “Who am I (the subject)?” As long as a system gives answers to these three questions in a manner that is logically coherent and not conflicting with experience, it has to be accepted as a possibility.

Non-religious philosophies do not have the obligation that the answers to these three questions should result in a system that also promotes goodness and happiness. Religious philosophies have this obligation. Thus, various religions are nothing but various systems of philosophies that answer these three questions in a manner that it promotes goodness and happiness. With this core, the religions weave a huge network of mythologies, legends (glorified and dramatized history of people), rituals and customs, based on and to suit, the cultural context of the people who are addressed by the religion.

Religious Plurality

When religions are understood in this way, there is no conflict in the mutual existence of various religions. Though all religions point to a state of unconditional happiness as the goal, not all religions describe it as the same when it comes to the details. Various religions offer various descriptions of the state of unconditional happiness. Some religions say it is in a Heaven. Some religions say it is in the proximity of a Supreme Being. Some religions say it is possible only after death. Some religions says it is possible here and now.

Depending on what a person can understand and accept, he can choose any of the options. Some of them may even not stand rigorous logic. Still, it may serve the current understanding of the person and help him to be good. Depending on the description of the goal that is accepted, the means would surely be different.

Thus, there cannot be one religion that is suitable to everyone. Religious plurality has to be accepted. Even within the same religion, each person’s understanding and practice can be different depending on his capacity. As the person grows, his understanding and practice can change. He may even find some inadequacies in the religion that he has been following so far, and decide to switch to a different religion.

Religion vs Culture

It is highly debatable how closely religion and culture are connected. The culture of a person includes the philosophy, mythology, legends, rituals, customs, clothes, cuisine, festivals, language, literature, poetry, architecture, painting, sculpture, music, dance, etc. In general, we see that religion and culture have been going together. This has created a lot of violence and destruction – physically and emotionally – to different cultures in the world.

Almost all the indigenous cultures of Europe, Northern Africa, Arabia, Russia, Americas, Australia, New Zealand and many other places in the world have been wiped off the face of the Earth because of the aggressive exclusive propagation of two of the world’s major organized religions – Christianity and Islam. The Viking, Celtic, Saxon, Bavarian, Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Inca, Aztec, Maori – the list is endless – cultures are today only in museums. Many of them have been lost without even a trace in museums. This is a great loss to humanity. When we are so much concerned about the extinction of an obscure species of fish deep in an ocean, we are blind to the extinction of so many glorious human cultures. The descendants of those cultures may be living, but the cultures have been irrevocably lost. Along with them we have lost unimaginable wealth of art, poetry, literature, ideas, cuisine, etc.

The pity is that the trend has not changed. Active propagation of exclusive religions along with their culture is destroying indigenous cultures in a large scale today. It is an urgent necessity to come up with alternate ideas and concepts so that people have a wide choice of religions and philosophies to choose from, and at the same time, indigenous cultures are preserved alive. Culture lives in the life of the people who actively follow it. We need to work out, how various religious options can be provided to people, without changing their culture.

Successful Experiments

Luckily, we have a few successful histories of such propagation.

The Christianity that is being propagated today is not that of Christ. Christ lived in a very Asian environment. His ideas were taken up by Rome and completely Romanized. The architecture, interiors, icons, rituals, customs, etc. of today’s Christianity are more of the Medieval Roman royalty than those of Christ. (However, Rome lost its mythology. The myths and legends of the Old Testament replaced its own.) Thus, if a religion can be assimilated into the Roman culture retaining many of its cultural elements, surely it can be assimilated into other cultures too, without disturbing their cultural elements. But unfortunately, due to political agenda, the Roman version of Christianity (may be Churchianity is a better word) was propagated along with the cultural elements.

The way Buddhism was propagated is more ideal. The Buddhism in Tibet is much different from that in Sri Lanka. The Buddhism in Thailand, Japan, etc. are each distinct. In each culture, Buddhism exists with much of the indigenous culture intact. Similarly, Hinduism in Thailand, Bali, Cambodia, etc. are also indigenous. The clothes, music, dance, etc. used for depicting Hindu themes are totally of the respective cultures. The mythology and legends have been mixed with the local indigenous mythology and legends. For example, you can find the worship of traditional Chinese deities have never conflicted with the worship of various forms of Buddha. The paintings and sculptures of Buddha are very Chinese. There is no trace of India in them. Thus, Buddhism and Hinduism are offered as localized supplements to the existing religion and culture.

Study of these histories and blending methods will show the way forward to peaceful propagation of religious ideas without destroying the indigenous cultures.

Way Forward

Thus, for a peaceful humanity without destroying indigenous cultures, it is necessary to understand religions from a more down-to-earth perspective. Religions need to be seen as various alternatives to suit the understanding and inclination of various people. Propagation of religions should be in the spirit of providing alternative reasons and means to be good and happy. Exclusive claims should be dropped. Religion should be separated from culture. Propagation of religion should not be accompanied by replacement of existing culture. Religious conversion should be initiated from the individual and not from the religious institution. It should be more for seeking a meaning to life than for seeking worldly ends.

This way, religious plurality can be a great asset of humanity. It will enrich the lives of individuals and societies.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment